In the European Union, Maritime Spatial Planning (MSP) has been regarded as a means of promoting the sustainable growth of the blue economy. Consequently, where the planning outcomes affect the business operations in marine areas, commercial and industry stakeholders should have an important role in the planning process. However, the business perspective in MSP has gained little attention in stakeholder involvement literature. The aim of this study is to elaborate on the business sector's interest and involvement in MSP in the Baltic Sea region. The findings are based on the first-hand experiences of MSP authorities and experts. Furthermore, perspectives from two sea-use sectors, maritime transport and marine tourism, have been investigated using online questionnaires to discover their views. The study focuses on the questions of who to involve and what are the driving forces promoting business sector involvement. Even though MSP is a form of broad-scale planning, the results indicate that all spatial and organizational scales from local to international and from small enterprises to umbrella organizations should be considered when designing approaches to business stakeholder participation. The planning authorities need to consider what are the benefits and challenges of involving different types of business stakeholders. Planners often rely on organizations that represent business stakeholders and individual companies. It is resource effective to interact with representatives as they are considered to have a broad and general knowledge of the respective sector's interests. However, in some cases it is beneficial to also integrate individual companies, especially in local or regional contexts.
Using evidence from 25,250 records of vessels entering and clearing the rivers of the Chesapeake Bay, this article demonstrates that intercolonial trading captains and crews significantly reduced the number of days their vessels spent in port in Virginia between 1698 and 1766. This contraction reflected a quantifying ethos in shipping that emerged during the early age of sail as the result of mutually reinforcing legal requirements and management practices. Responding to these productivity pressures, captains embraced practices that limited sailors’ freedom and turned to enslaved sailors to guarantee their maritime labor force. Embracing unfreedom aided captains to realize the dispatch goals that helped guarantee their investors’ returns.
This paper describes the challenges of the maritime supply chain compared to land transport and discusses the new digital initiatives to simplify the processes and enable a better plan for the entire supply chain. First, the background is outlined with an example of the extensive admin processes in maritime transport compared to road transport, followed by a case example presenting the processes of a booking. The case study concludes that the lack of integration is costly in terms of both admin resources, as well as lost capacity on some ships and missing capacity on others. Finally, the evolution of new digital initiatives are discussed, both in general and in terms of competing “alliances” as seen in the airline industry. The paper concludes that the information exchange in the maritime industry has moved drastically in the last 3 years and that one initiative, TradeLens, seems to have gained a position as maritime standard despite a problematic start with many competing initiatives.
A novel damping system is developed to address offshore wind turbine tower vibration exacerbated by global warming-induced coastal extreme weather. Through parametric optimization, it stabilizes nacelle displacement under normal loads and reduces responses in diverse wind conditions: 18.8% max bending stress reduction during gusts, 26.3% nacelle displacement mitigation under high turbulence, and 7.9% displacement standard deviation reductions in 50-year extreme winds. A Norwegian wind farm extends tower life by 44% at the tower top and 99.36% at the tower base. Under varying gust angles, it reduces nacelle displacement (4.3%) and bottom bending moment (3.2%), enhancing structural stability. These demonstrate their potential to cut maintenance costs and extend lifetime, which is crucial for offshore wind turbine development.
Mooring failures significantly threaten the stability of Floating Offshore Wind Turbines (FOWT) under extreme environmental conditions. This study presents an innovative shared damping mooring system incorporating Seaflex dampers to improve structural stability and operational reliability. Dynamic simulations under 1-year and 50-year return period sea states demonstrate the system’s effectiveness. Under Ultimate Limit State (ULS) conditions, the system reduces surge displacement by 59%, pitch angle by 47%, and mooring line tension by 72%. Under Accidental Limit State (ALS) conditions, it mitigates load spikes, reduces drift displacement by 60%, and improves safety factors by 50%. The comparison shows chain and wire rope configurations have better load reduction performance in the shared damping scheme. Lightweight and adaptable, the Seaflex dampers enhance broad-spectrum damping without affecting platform buoyancy. This study provides a robust solution for improving FOWT safety and durability in harsh marine environments, enabling large-scale offshore wind energy development.
This study proposes a novel tower damping system to enhance the structural performance of the NREL 5 MW semi-submersible wind turbine under operational and extreme load conditions. Environmental load data from the Norwegian MET center was analyzed to characterize the loading conditions for floating offshore wind turbines (FOWT). The probability density spectrum of sea state data was employed to identify operational load conditions. At the same time, the Inverse First-Order Reliability Method (IFORM) was used to derive the 50-year extreme sea state. Perform a fully coupled Aero-Hydro-Servo-Elastic simulation of the FOWT dynamic model with a damping system using OrcaFlex software. The results reveal that: Under operational sea states, the turbine tower-top displacement was reduced by 60–70%, and acceleration by 30–40%, enhancing tower-top stability. Under extreme loads, tower-top acceleration was reduced by 5–7%, and displacement by 6–8%. Cumulative damage assessments indicate a reduction in fatigue damage of up to 72%, with the effective fatigue life of the tower base extended by 136%. The proposed damping system significantly reduces vibration under fatigue and extreme load conditions.
The “Initial IMO Strategy” was adopted in the 72nd session of the Marine Environment Protection Committee (MEPC 72) of the International Maritime Organization (IMO) in April 2018. It has set, among other things, ambitious targets to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from ships, and purports to express a strong political will to phase them out as soon as possible. The most ambitious of these targets is to reduce GHG emissions by 2050 at least 50% vis-à-vis 2008 levels, and there is also an intermediate target to reduce CO2 emissions per transport work by 2030 at least 40%, again vis-à-vis 2008 levels. More than three years since the adoption of the Initial IMO Strategy, this chapter takes stock at the status of shipping decarbonisation and attempts to assess prospects for the future. Obstacles towards achieving the IMO targets are identified and discussed.
The purpose of this short paper is to provide a brief and non‐encyclopedic commentary on the decisions made at IMO MEPC 76 (June 2021) and assess the prospects for the future of shipping decarbonization in the aftermath of that meeting. The recent action of the European Commission to include shipping into the EU Emissions Trading System (ETS) is also discussed.
The purpose of this paper is to assess the status and prospects of the decarbonization of maritime transport. Already more than two years have passed since the landmark decision of the International Maritime Organization (IMO) in April 2018, which entailed ambitious targets to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from ships. The paper attempts to address the following three questions: (a) where do we stand with respect to GHG emissions from ships, (b) how is the Initial IMO Strategy progressing, and (c) what should be done to move ahead? To that effect, our methodology includes commenting on some of the key issues addressed by the recently released 4th IMO GHG study, assessing progress at the IMO since 2018, and finally identifying other issues that we consider relevant and important as regards maritime GHG emissions, such as for instance the role of the European Green Deal and how this may interact with the IMO process. Even though the approach of the paper is to a significant extent qualitative, some key quantitative and modelling aspects are considered as well. On the basis of our analysis, our main conjecture is that there is not yet light at the end of the tunnel with respect to decarbonizing maritime transport.
There have been a number of recent papers in the literature that investigate the relationship between ship speed and required power, or between ship speed and fuel consumption. Using regression analyses for selected case studies these papers show that in many cases the traditional “cube law” is not valid, and exponents lower than 3 (and in some cases lower than 2 or even below 1) are more appropriate. Perhaps more important, they use these results to derive implications on the validity (or lack thereof) of policies to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from ships through slow steaming. This paper reviews some of these papers and shows that their results are partially based on pitfalls in the analysis which are identified. Policy implications particularly on the quest to reduce GHG emissions from ships are also discussed.