Wind Propulsion Systems (WPS) have gained significant attention as a means of decarbonizing shipping. Limitations in available deck space, emissions reduction targets, and regulatory compliance have led to a wide array of potential WPS configurations, each exhibiting distinct aerodynamic performance and requiring unique optimum sail trims for each unit due to complex interactions. This variability challenges existing aerodynamic models and optimization efforts for maximizing fuel savings. To address this, we present a novel methodology that, for the first time in WPS aerodynamic performance prediction, combines Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD), independent sail trim optimization, and Machine Learning (ML) to develop surrogate models — Gaussian Process Regression and Feedforward Neural Networks — that rapidly predict aerodynamic performance with CFD-equivalent accuracy. These surrogates capture aerodynamic interactions across various WPS configurations, including unit number, deck arrangement, independent sail trim, hull characteristics, and wind conditions. While employing established ML techniques, our approach is novel in its resource-efficient generation of a comprehensive aerodynamic database, derived from the first in-depth independent trim optimization of a DynaRig case study. Our approach enables the modeling of complex, non-linear interactions that traditional interpolation methods fail to capture. Results show that the developed surrogate models achieve CFD-level accuracy, with an average error below 1 while significantly reducing computational time. This ML-enhanced framework facilitates extensive, rapid WPS design optimizations, supporting efficient integration into performance prediction programs (PPPs) and maximizing fuel savings and emissions reductions tailored to specific routes and wind conditions.Machine Learning; CFD-Simulations; Aerodynamic Performance; Wind Propulsion Systems; Green Shipping; Independent Sail Trim Optimization.
This paper proposes an economic and resilient operation architecture for a coupled hydrogen-electricity energy system operating at port. The architecture is a multi-objective optimization problem, which includes the energy system optimal economy as the goal orientation and the optimal resilience as the goal orientation. The optimal resilience orientation looks for the best resilience performance of the port through reasonable energy management including (1) reducing the amount of electricity purchased by the port power grid from the external power grid (2) improving the energy level of electric energy storage (3) improving the energy level of hydrogen energy storage. Taking the actual coupled hydrogen-electricity energy system of Ningbo-Zhoushan Port as an example, four typical scenarios were selected according to renewable generation and load characteristics, and a comparative analysis was carried out during the oriented operation. The results show that although the resilience orientation increases the operating cost compared with the economic orientation, the four scenarios reduce the load shedding by 44.84%, 30.26%, 48.49% and 34.37% respectively when the external power grid is disconnected. The impact of changes in resilience-oriented weight coefficients and hydrogen price on system resilience performance was investigated to provide more references for decision makers.
Hydrogen-electricity integrated multi-energy systems are promising approaches to reduce carbon emissions in ports. However, the stochastic nature of renewable energy and the imbalance between the renewable generation and load demand in ports necessitate the design of an appropriate coupled hydrogen-electricity energy storage systems (CHEESS). This paper proposes a multi-objective optimization model for CHEESS configuration in random unbalanced port integrated multi-energy systems (PIMES), aiming to minimize its life-cycle cost and carbon emissions through co-optimization of sizing and energy management. A hierarchical two-stage framework is proposed to solve the multi-objective model. The proposed optimization framework is applied to a real PIMES at the Ningbo-Zhoushan Port. The results show that the proposed method can save 10.54% of the monetary cost and 19.67% of carbon emissions over the entire life-cycle of the system. The study demonstrates that the proposed framework has the potential to generate significant economic and environmental benefits and provides a feasible solution for port authorities seeking to implement CHEESS, aiming to promote sustainability in port operations.
Driven by regulatory mandates, International Maritime Organization (IMO) decarbonization targets, market pressure, and evolving societal expectations, the maritime industry is undergoing a fundamental transition towards full decarbonization. This shift has renewed interest in Wind Propulsion Systems (WPSs) as viable propulsion alternatives, reflected in their increasing adoption. However, widespread implementation remains challenging. Each WPS installation design excels under specific conditions, which makes selecting the most cost-effective WPS installation complex. Failure to optimize design and placement can lead to suboptimal fuel savings or unprofitable deployments, limiting industry confidence, and slowing adoption.
To address these challenges, this PhD Thesis presents a novel modelling framework to optimize WPS installation designs by evaluating their cost-benefit trade-offs. The framework identifies the optimal WPS class, design, positioning, and arrangement to maximize fuel savings and emission reductions while minimizing investment costs, tailored to an operator’s specific profile. The study addresses three main objectives: (1) determining the most cost-effective WPS installation design, (2) enhancing industry understanding of WPS performance, and (3) supporting informed decision-making for shipowners and operators.
The results demonstrate that there is no on-size-fits-all WPS solution; instead, each optimal configuration requires a use-case-specific evaluation, accounting for factors such as ship type, route, wind conditions, emissions reduction targets, and operational constraints. However, general trends emerge. Higher emissions reduction ambitions – requiring larger WPS installations — favor high lift-to-drag ratio and lightweight technologies for costeffectiveness. In contrast, low lift-to-drag ratio systems are more sensitive to deck placement and wind conditions due to the resulting hydrodynamic penalties to counteract aerodynamic
forces, though these effects become less significant for lower emissions reduction targets. Installation viability is further constrained by factors such as maximum air draft and cargo space loss due to weight penalties, which may significantly impact economic feasibility.
Optimization of WPS installation design is found to be critical for maximizing economic returns and ensuring fair comparisons across different WPS classes, as each class has unique performance characteristics. The most cost-effective configurations generally involve max imizing unit spacing to reduce aerodynamic interactions and placing units near the hydrodynamic center of lateral resistance to minimize added resistance penalties. Suboptimal designs can extend payback periods by over 150% compared to optimized configurations. Additionally, while WPS-equipped vessels require higher upfront investment, they demonstrate rapid payback periods and strong profitability, particularly in favorable operational and economic conditions.
A critical threshold of limited return on investment is identified for retrofit installations, occurring when additional WPS units no longer yield increased fuel and emissions savings. This is due to hydrodynamic penalties required to maintain yaw moment balance, ultimately offsetting the WPS benefits. This also underscores the need for an optimized deployment strategy to maximize savings while minimizing investment costs, preventing unprofitable installations that could foster skepticism and hinder adoption.
The methods and findings presented in this PhD Thesis provide a foundation for unlocking the full potential of wind propulsion systems, supporting a more sustainable, cost-effective, and decarbonized shipping industry.
The maritime sector faces increasing pressure to reduce emissions, especially in ports, pushing governments and shipowners towards greener energy sources. Conventional diesel generator (DG) powered vessels experience increased fuel consumption and emissions during low-power demand due to fluctuating loads with changing sea conditions. Integrating battery energy storage can absorb excess power, optimize DG operation, reduce costs, and manage variable loads. Traditional shipboard power systems (SPS) rely on centralized control schemes, which pose the risk of single points of failure, scalability issues, and increased latency due to centralized decision-making. Decentralized control improves resilience and scalability by eliminating single points of failure and enabling local decision-making, which improves response times and system robustness. Although recent research has explored decentralized control strategies for AC or DC-based SPS, there is limited work on hybrid AC-DC SPS architectures. This paper proposes a decentralized control strategy for integrating multiple power sources within a hybrid AC-DC network to optimize their operation. This approach allows vessels to operate in various modes, including full diesel, hybrid, and zero emission, and seamlessly transition between these modes as needed. The effectiveness of the proposed control scheme is validated through simulation and high-fidelity software-in-the-loop (SIL) results in OPAL-RT 5700, demonstrating adaptive power sharing among different resources.
Hydrogen energy is a promising solution for prompting low-carbon port development. This study introduces two hydrogen utilization strategies: hydrogen consumption-driven strategy (HCDS) and hydrogen storage-driven strategy (HSDS). Using data from a real port and a life-cycle assessment approach, a case study is conducted to compare their economic and ecological performances. The results show that HCDS enhances economic benefits, with an annualized cost of 66.1 million CNY, which is 11% lower than HSDS. Additionally, HCDS is sensitive to electricity prices and grid carbon emission factor. In contrast, HSDS offers superior ecological benefits, with an annualized carbon footprint of 31,300 tons of CO₂, which is 12% lower than HCDS, and is mainly sensitive to purchase prices and emission factors of electricity and hydrogen. This study provides critical insights into the trade-offs between economic and ecological performance under different hydrogen utilization strategies, offering practical guidance for implementing hydrogen energy system applications in ports.
The liner shipping industry is undergoing an extensive decarbonization process to reduce its 275 million tons of CO2 emissions as of 2018. In this process, the long-term solution is the introduction of new alternative maritime fuels. The introduction of alternative fuels presents a great set of unknowns. Among these are the strategic concerns regarding sourcing of alternative fuels and, operationally, how the new fuels might affect the network of shipping routes. We propose a problem formulation that integrates fuel supply/demand into the liner shipping network design problem. Here, we present a model to determine the production sites and distribution of new alternative fuels-we consider methanol and ammonia. For the network design problem, we apply an adaptive large neighborhood search combined with a delayed column generation process. In addition, we wish to test the effect of designing a robust network under uncertain demand conditions because of the problem's strategic nature and importance. Therefore, our proposed solution method will have a deterministic and stochastic setup when we apply it to the second-largest multihub instance, WorldSmall, known from LINER-LIB. In the deterministic setting, our proposed solution method finds a new best solution to three instances from LINER-LIB. For the main considered WorldSmall instance, we even noticed a new best solution in all our tested fuel settings. In addition, we note a profit drop of 7.2% between a bunker-powered and pure alternative fuel-powered network. The selected alternative fuel production sites favor a proximity to European ports and have a heavy reliance on wind turbines. The stochastic results clearly showed that the found networks were much more resilient to the demand changes. Neglecting the perspective of uncertain demand leads to highly fluctuating profits.
Incumbent clinker production practices fall short of meeting carbon-emission neutral targets, pressing the need to implement waste valorization approaches in cement plants to mitigate environmental impacts. However, there is a lack of knowledge on the future environmental performance of emerging waste-to-heat and fuel upcycling in clinker manufacturing. This study examines the prospective life cycle impacts of (1) solid recovered fuel (SRF) utilization and (2) on-site marine fuel production using integrated fluidized bed pyrolysis to substitute fossil fuels in clinker production and marine transportation. Environmental impacts are projected between 2025 and 2050 by applying learning effects in the foreground life cycle inventory and shared socioeconomic pathways (SSP1, SSP2), extended with the 1.9 W m−2 representative concentration pathway (SSP2-RCP1.9), in the background system. The highest decarbonization progress (−538.9 kg CO2-eq (t clinker)−1) is achieved under the SSP2-RCP1.9 development trajectory, driven by avoidance of emissions from waste management systems and converting biogenic carbon-rich municipal solid waste resources. The predicted CO2-eq impacts are found to be lower than the point source emission from raw meal calcination in several SSP scenarios, indicating that carbon-emission neutrality is attainable in combination with retrofitted carbon capture, utilization, and storage (CCUS) technologies. The assessment highlights the potential for burden shifting to other environmental impacts, e.g., particulate matter formation (+37.0 % by 2050), pointing to the need to evaluate additional pyrolysis oil upgrading and NOX emission mitigation strategies. Overall, synergizing waste pyrolysis with clinker production is found to be favourable due to (i) improved energy requirements, (ii) reduced fossil fuel use and impacts on climate change and ecosystem quality, and (iii) high potential for technological learning-driven environmental progress.
This study introduces WindWise, a cost–benefit analysis and design optimization tool for Wind Propulsion Systems (WPS) in sustainable shipping. By integrating route simulations, ship constraints, and fuel pricing scenarios, WindWise determines the optimal WPS configuration to maximize fuel savings and minimize payback periods. A retrofit case study of an oil tanker evaluates two WPS classes—DynaRigs and Rotor Sails—across multiple operational and economic conditions. Results reveal that optimal configurations vary based on constraints: in an unconstrained scenario, larger, well-spaced installations minimize aerodynamic losses, whereas realistic constraints shift the preference towards smaller, distributed setups to mitigate cargo loss and air draft penalties. Rotor Sails offer lower upfront costs and shorter payback periods for modest savings targets and for side-wind routes, while DynaRigs emerge as the more viable solution for higher emissions reductions and long-term profitability. Optimization of WPS configurations proves crucial, with non-optimized configurations exhibiting payback periods over 150% higher than optimized ones. Although payback period remains an important metric, considering both payback and net present value provides a more comprehensive assessment of WPS financial viability, with Rotor Sails generally offering faster payback but DynaRigs delivering higher long-term profitability across most scenarios.
The ‘port managing body (PMB)’ plays a central role in the development of the port. Public funding for investment projects of the port managing bodies is common in the EU as well as most other countries. This paper adds to the body of knowledge on port investments and financing challenges with an analysis of data from two surveys that were carried in 2018 and 2023. This analysis yields the following conclusions. First, the PMBs in the EU have shifted their investments, in response to changing investment drivers. The increasing relevance of the transition to a net-zero economy leads to a shift towards investments in projects that reduce environmental effects and/or allow private investments in new green activities such as the production of zero-emission fuels. Second, financial bottlenecks are the most important bottlenecks for the execution of the projects of PMBs. Third, the PMBs have high aspirations with regard to public funding, both on the EU and national level. Fourth, there is a difference between two types of PMBs: state-owned commercial port development companies and the public sector embedded port authorities; the latter execute less projects without public funding and are more oriented on national public funding than on EU funding. Finally, the societal value creation of the investments of PMBs is used to justify public funding aspirations. The PMBs indicate that the majority of their investments create societal value, often by enabling emission reductions and by reduced local negative externalities.