This study investigates the critical parameters necessary for evaluating large-scale renewable offshore energy hubs, based on insights from industry experts. Using a Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis methodology, the experts emphasized that, in their view, technical and economic parameters rank higher than environmental and societal considerations when evaluating large-scale renewable offshore projects, including green hydrogen production. Environmental and societal parameters should not be neglected, but they ought to be evaluated outside this assessment framework. This could refer to the environmental impact assessment already in use. These findings provide a foundation for evolving the traditional Triple Bottom Line theory into a Quadruple Bottom Line approach by incorporating technical parameters alongside economic, social, and environmental factors, while addressing the specific challenges of offshore energy hubs. Among all the parameters ranked across the four domains, the top 15 were exclusively techno-economic, with technical and economic scores averaging 4.5 and 4.3 out of 5, respectively. In contrast, societal and environmental scores averaged below 3.0. To ensure the successful deployment of offshore energy hubs, a stepwise approach is recommended to manage complexity, reduce risks, and support scalable solutions. This approach aims to align the needed industrial parameters with the demands of the energy transition.
The International Council for the Exploration of the Sea (ICES) occupies a central role in the advice system to support the implementation of an ecosystem approach to fisheries management (EAFM) in the European Union (EU). Despite improvements, its capacity to deliver ecosystem advice seems to be far from a fully functional operational framework. To what extent availability of appropriate scientific advice is a barrier for a more widespread use of an EAFM in Europe remains an open question. Building on the findings of a large research project, this article explores what advice ICES can provide. The article concludes that: (i) ICES has taken a leading role in generating an EAFM framework in which management decisions can operate; (ii) the advice “suppliers” and the advice “users” agree on the feasibility of using existing knowledge to “do EAFM now”; (iii) ICES can address a range of shortcomings, but some of the present bottlenecks demand concerted action between the advisory system and the political realm. The implementation of an EAFM requires consistency between science and management. ICES appears as well-suited to facilitate the dialogue on applying an EAFM in the EU, but it is unrealistic to expect ICES to produce all the answers.
This article builds on rich empirical data following our unexpected discovery of a local practice to circumvent a stressful
and counterproductive work environment due to distrust at the Port of Tema in Ghana. Using theoretical work on networks,
trust, and humor, as well as extensive ethnographic feldwork, we found that the humorous atmosphere at the regularly
held physical berthing meetings fosters a sense of community, which enables competing professions, private companies,
and public institutions to manage their mutual distrust. In an environment where trust among competitors is unrealistic, we
argue that the objective of the performance of humor and transparency at the physical berthing meetings is the management
of distrust rather than the creation of trust. The meetings have, gradually, grown to serve as a pragmatic local stakeholder
adaptation to the challenges posed by universally perceived politicized, opaque, and corrupt business practices at the Port
of Tema and beyond. In conclusion, we posit that our empirical fndings allow us to identify the potential of and gaps in
theories about trust and humor in understanding the dynamics of coping strategies among competitors in business settings
that are characterized by unethical practices.
This article builds on rich empirical data following our unexpected discovery of a local practice to circumvent a stressful
and counterproductive work environment due to distrust at the Port of Tema in Ghana. Using theoretical work on networks,
trust, and humor, as well as extensive ethnographic feldwork, we found that the humorous atmosphere at the regularly
held physical berthing meetings fosters a sense of community, which enables competing professions, private companies,
and public institutions to manage their mutual distrust. In an environment where trust among competitors is unrealistic, we
argue that the objective of the performance of humor and transparency at the physical berthing meetings is the management
of distrust rather than the creation of trust. The meetings have, gradually, grown to serve as a pragmatic local stakeholder
adaptation to the challenges posed by universally perceived politicized, opaque, and corrupt business practices at the Port
of Tema and beyond. In conclusion, we posit that our empirical fndings allow us to identify the potential of and gaps in
theories about trust and humor in understanding the dynamics of coping strategies among competitors in business settings
that are characterized by unethical practices.
Two different media platforms played a key role in keeping Tema Port in Ghana afloat during the period immediately leading up to and during the three-week COVID-19 pandemic-related lockdown in late March–April of 2020. The one media platform, Eye on Port, is a weekly broadcast television show by the port’s authorities, which caters primarily to external commercial stakeholders of the port. The other platform is a closed WhatsApp forum used by stakeholders working at the operational level of the port. Both platforms served specific needs among their users, who had been restricted in their mobility but had to keep the port operational. Combining ‘scalable sociality’ with the concept of polymedia, we identify how the two media functioned to meet the different informational and conversational needs of their respective users. We argue that either medium alone could not fulfil the communicative needs necessary to keep the port operational during the early stage of the COVID-19 pandemic.
Non-indigenous species (NIS) pose a major threat to biodiversity and the functioning and services of ecosystems. Despite their rapid spread in coastal waters worldwide, biotic invasions are widely disregarded in marine conservation planning. To guide conservation actions, a better understanding of the underlying mechanisms determining the success of NIS are therefore needed. Here we develop a combined modelling approach to identify the key drivers and community assembly processes determining the occurrence of invasive benthic invertebrates, using Danish coastal waters as a case study. To reflect factors affecting the introduction, establishment and spread of NIS throughout the area, we compiled long-term monitoring data on NIS, as well as information on commercial shipping, environmental conditions and estimates of larvae settling densities derived from drift model simulations informed by species traits. We then applied a set of species distribution models to identify the key drivers determining the occurrence of NIS. Our results demonstrate a significant positive effect of vessel activity, a negative effect of depth and bottom salinity, as well as a positive effect of the simulated settling densities on the probability of presence. Taken together, our results highlight the role of commercial shipping, habitat characteristics and passive advection of early-life stages on the presence of NIS. Our combined modelling approach provide improved process understanding on the key community assembly processes determining the presence of NIS and may serve to guide monitoring, management and conservation planning in order to limit future invasions and their negative consequences on coastal ecosystems.
This study introduces WindWise, a cost–benefit analysis and design optimization tool for Wind Propulsion Systems (WPS) in sustainable shipping. By integrating route simulations, ship constraints, and fuel pricing scenarios, WindWise determines the optimal WPS configuration to maximize fuel savings and minimize payback periods. A retrofit case study of an oil tanker evaluates two WPS classes—DynaRigs and Rotor Sails—across multiple operational and economic conditions. Results reveal that optimal configurations vary based on constraints: in an unconstrained scenario, larger, well-spaced installations minimize aerodynamic losses, whereas realistic constraints shift the preference towards smaller, distributed setups to mitigate cargo loss and air draft penalties. Rotor Sails offer lower upfront costs and shorter payback periods for modest savings targets and for side-wind routes, while DynaRigs emerge as the more viable solution for higher emissions reductions and long-term profitability. Optimization of WPS configurations proves crucial, with non-optimized configurations exhibiting payback periods over 150% higher than optimized ones. Although payback period remains an important metric, considering both payback and net present value provides a more comprehensive assessment of WPS financial viability, with Rotor Sails generally offering faster payback but DynaRigs delivering higher long-term profitability across most scenarios.
This scientific study aims to compare the significance of onboard positioning of two different classes of wind propulsion systems for retrofit installations to maximize fuel and emissions savings. The study focuses on comparing the performance a low lift-to-drag ratio wind propulsion system, the Rotor Sail, and a high lift-to-drag ratio one, the DynaRig, installed at different places on a real 84000 DWT bulk carrier ship to identify the most efficient placement of these two distinct systems to achieve maximum fuel efficiency. The investigation involves a comprehensive analysis of available deck spaces, and performance prediction program modeling is employed to estimate potential fuel savings for a typical route followed by the vessel. The results show that placing the WPS far forward, close to the hydrodynamic centre of lateral resistance, results in overall higher savings. Both WPS classes see a penalty when placed far from the hydrodynamic centre of lateral resistance, reducing their overall savings potential. However, Rotor Sails are more adversely affected due to their enhanced side force generation per unit thrust. Consequently, the placement of Rotor Sails becomes crucial, especially under upwind conditions, while DynaRigs prove more versatile for installations in the aft. This research provides valuable insights into enhancing the ship's energy efficiency and reducing its environmental impact in the maritime industry.
Wind propulsion systems (WPS) for commercial ships can be a key ingredient to achieving the IMO green targets. Most WPS installations will operate in conjunction with propellers and marine engines in a hybrid mode, which will affect their performance. The present paper presents the development of a generic, fast, and easy tool to predict the propeller and engine performance variation, along with the cost, as a function of the wind power installed in two operation conditions: fixed ship speed and constant shaft speed. Specific focus is directed toward showing generic trends and trade-offs that inform economic decision-making. To this end, a key feature of the presented work is the ability to assess the cost–benefit of both controllable pitch propellers and fixed pitch propellers (CPPs and FPPs). This provides advice on when, in terms of WPS installation size, it is worthwhile to install which kind of propeller. CPPs are found to be more suitable for newly built wind-powered ships (>70% wind power), while a conventional FPP is satisfactory for wind-assisted ships (<70% wind power) and retrofitted installations. The results for a 91,373 GT bulk carrier showed that a WPS unloads the propeller and the engine, which leads to an increase in the propulsive efficiency and a detrimental rise of the engine specific fuel oil consumption. However, propeller gains are found to be greater than engine losses, which result in extra savings. Thus, not only does a WPS save fuel and corresponding pollutant emissions, but it also increases the entire propulsive efficiency.
This study introduces WindWise, a cost–benefit analysis and design optimization tool for Wind Propulsion Systems (WPS) in sustainable shipping. By integrating route simulations, ship constraints, and fuel pricing scenarios, WindWise determines the optimal WPS configuration to maximize fuel savings and minimize payback periods. A retrofit case study of an oil tanker evaluates two WPS classes—DynaRigs and Rotor Sails—across multiple operational and economic conditions. Results reveal that optimal configurations vary based on constraints: in an unconstrained scenario, larger, well-spaced installations minimize aerodynamic losses, whereas realistic constraints shift the preference towards smaller, distributed setups to mitigate cargo loss and air draft penalties. Rotor Sails offer lower upfront costs and shorter payback periods for modest savings targets and for side-wind routes, while DynaRigs emerge as the more viable solution for higher emissions reductions and long-term profitability. Optimization of WPS configurations proves crucial, with non-optimized configurations exhibiting payback periods over 150% higher than optimized ones. Although payback period remains an important metric, considering both payback and net present value provides a more comprehensive assessment of WPS financial viability, with Rotor Sails generally offering faster payback but DynaRigs delivering higher long-term profitability across most scenarios.