This paper presents the methods developed and key findings of the IWEC project performed by Ocean Harvesting Technologies AB (OHT). It aimed to reduce the levelized cost of energy (LCoE) of OHT’s wave energy converter InfinityWEC, by analysing how different key parameters impact cost and annual output using a model of a 100-MW array installation. Component-level cost functions were developed and mapped to key parameters and constraints of the system. A large number of system configurations were then evaluated with a numerically efficient 3 degree-of-freedom (DoF) nonlinear radiationdiffraction model in WEC-Sim along with OHT’s sea statetuned polynomial reactive control (PRC). The most promising configurations were identified and investigated in more detail. The configuration with the best LCoE were finally identified and analysed further, including estimation of the effect of changing the PRC to model predictive control, which resulted in 17-34% higher annual output and 12-23% lower LCoE. The final LCoE was found to be 93-162 EUR MWh at 100 MW installed capacity. An important finding from the study is that using simplified metrics such as CAPEX/ton was found to be irrelevant. Numerical wave tank testing, high-fidelity computational fluid dynamics (CFD), were used to tune the viscous drag of the 3 DoF WEC-Sim model. Applying verification and validation (V&V) techniques the CFD simulations showed a relatively large numerical uncertainty, but the average power and the motion responses were found to be sufficiently accurate.
Coupled mooring analysis using CFD with dynamic mooring models is becoming an established field. This is an important step for better predictions of responses of moored marine structures in extreme sea states and also for capturing the low-frequency response correctly. The coupling between the CFD and mooring solvers are most often carried out by exchanging the fairlead/anchor points and fairlead forces. In this paper we will discuss the effects of using (i) viscous fluid flow on a mooring component level (submerged buoys and clump weights) and (ii) the fluid-structure coupling between the viscous fluid solver and the mooring system.
High-fidelity viscous computational fluid dynamics (CFD) models coupled to dynamic mooring models is becoming an established tool for marine wave-body-mooring (WBM) interaction problems. The CFD and the mooring solvers most often communicate by exchanging positions and mooring forces at the mooring fairleads. Mooring components such as submerged buoys and clump weights are usually not resolved in the CFD model, but are treated as Morison-type bodies. This paper presents two recent developments in high-fidelity WBM modelling: (i) a one-way fluid-mooring coupling that samples the CFD fluid kinematics to approximate drag and inertia forces in the mooring model; and (ii) support for inter-moored multibody simulations that can resolve fluid dynamics on a mooring component level. The developments are made in the high-order discontinuous Galerkin mooring solver MoodyCore, and in the two-phase incompressible Navier–Stokes finite volume solver OpenFOAM. The fluid-mooring coupling is verified with experimental tests of a mooring cable in steady current. It is also used to model the response of the slack-moored DeepCwind FOWT exposed to regular waves. Minor effects of fluid-mooring coupling were noted, as expected since this a mild wave case. The inter-mooring development is demonstrated on a point-absorbing WEC moored with a hybrid mooring system, fully resolved in CFD-MoodyCore. The WEC (including a quasi-linear PTO) and the submerged buoys are resolved in CFD, while the mooring dynamics include inter-mooring effects and the one-way sampling of the flow. The combined wave-body-mooring model is judged to be very complete and to cover most of the relevant effects for marine WBM problems.
We numerically simulate the hydrodynamic response of a floating offshore wind turbine (FOWT) using computational fluid dynamics. The FOWT under consideration is a slack-moored 1:70 scale model of the UMaine VolturnUS-S semi-submersible platform. The test cases under consideration are (i) static equilibrium load cases, (ii) free decay tests, and (iii) two focused wave cases of different wave steepness. The FOWT is modeled using a two-phase Navier-Stokes solver inside the OpenFOAM-v2006 framework. The catenary mooring is computed by dynamically solving the equations of motion for an elastic cable using the MoodyCore solver. The results are shown to be in good agreement with measurements.
We numerically simulate the hydrodynamic response of a floating offshore wind turbine (FOWT) using computational fluid dynamics. The FOWT under consideration is a slack-moored 1:70 scale model of the UMaine VolturnUS-S semi-submersible platform. The test cases under consideration are (i) static equilibrium load cases, (ii) free decay tests, and (iii) two focused wave cases of different wave steepness. The FOWT is modeled using a two-phase Navier-Stokes solver inside the OpenFOAM-v2006 framework. The catenary mooring is computed by dynamically solving the equations of motion for an elastic cable using the MoodyCore solver. The results are shown to be in good agreement with measurements.
Linear potential flow (LPF) models remain the tools-of-the-trade in marine and ocean engineering despite their well-known assumptions of small amplitude waves and motions. As of now, nonlinear simulation tools are still too computationally demanding to be used in the entire design loop, especially when it comes to the evaluation of numerous irregular sea states. In this paper we aim to enhance the performance of the LPF models by introducing a hybrid LPF-ML (machine learning) approach, based on identification of nonlinear force corrections. The corrections are defined as the difference in hydrodynamic force (viscous and pressure-based) between high-fidelity CFD and LPF models. Using prescribed chirp motions with different amplitudes, we train a long short-term memory (LSTM) network to predict the corrections. The LSTM network is then linked to the MoodyMarine LPF model to provide the nonlinear correction force at every time-step, based on the dynamic state of the body and the corresponding forces from the LPF model. The method is illustrated for the case of a heaving sphere in decay, regular and irregular waves – including passive control. The hybrid LPF model is shown to give significant improvements compared to the baseline LPF model, even though the training is quite generic.
Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) is becoming an increasingly popular tool in the wave energy sector, and over the last five years we have seen many studies using CFD. While the focus of the CFD studies have been on the validation phase, comparing numerically obtained results against experimental tests, the uncertainties associated with the numerical solution has so far been more or less overlooked. There is a need to increase the reliability of the numerical solutions in order to perform simulation based optimization at early stages of development. In this paper we introduce a well-established verification and validation (V&V) technique. We focus on the solution verification stage and how to estimate spatial discretization errors for simulations where no exact solutions are available. The technique is applied to the cases of a 2D heaving box and a 3D moored cylinder. The uncertainties are typically acceptable with a few percent for the 2D box, while the 3D cylinder case show double digit uncertainties. The uncertainties are discussed with regard to physical features of the flow and numerical techniques.
The design of wave energy converters should rely on numerical models that are able to estimate accurately the dynamics and loads in extreme wave conditions. A high-fidelity CFD model of a 1:30 scale point-absorber is developed and validated on experimental data. This work constitutes beyond the state-of-the-art validation study as the system is subjected to 50-year return period waves. Additionally, a new methodology that addresses the well-known challenge in CFD codes of mesh deformation is successfully applied and validated. The CFD model is evaluated in different conditions: wave-only, free decay, and wave–structure interaction. The results show that the extreme waves and the experimental setup of the wave energy converter are simulated within an accuracy of 2%. The developed high-fidelity model is able to capture the motion of the system and the force in the mooring line under extreme waves with satisfactory accuracy. The deviation between the numerical and corresponding experimental RAOs is lower than 7% for waves with smaller steepness. In higher waves, the deviation increases up to 10% due to the inevitable wave reflections and complex dynamics. The pitch motion presents a larger deviation, however, the pitch is of secondary importance for a point-absorber wave energy converter.
The International Energy Agency Technology Collaboration Program for Ocean Energy Systems (OES) initiated the OES Wave Energy Conversion Modeling Task, which focused on the verification and validation of numerical models for simulating wave energy converters (WECs). The long-term goal is to assess the accuracy of and establish confidence in the use of numerical models used in design as well as power performance assessment of WECs. To establish this confidence, the authors used different existing computational modeling tools to simulate given tasks to identify uncertainties related to simulation methodologies: (i) linear potential flow methods; (ii) weakly nonlinear Froude–Krylov methods; and (iii) fully nonlinear methods (fully nonlinear potential flow and Navier–Stokes models). This article summarizes the code-to-code task and code-to-experiment task that have been performed so far in this project, with a focus on investigating the impact of different levels of nonlinearities in the numerical models. Two different WECs were studied and simulated. The first was a heaving semi-submerged sphere, where free-decay tests and both regular and irregular wave cases were investigated in a code-to-code comparison. The second case was a heaving float corresponding to a physical model tested in a wave tank. We considered radiation, diffraction, and regular wave cases and compared quantities, such as the WEC motion, power output and hydrodynamic loading.
A numerical model (MOODY) for the study of the dynamics of cables is presented in Palm et al. (2013), which was developed for the design of mooring systems for floating wave energy converters. But how does it behave when it is employed together with the tools used to model floating bodies? To answer this question, MOODY was coupled to a linear potential theory code and to a computational fluid dynamics code (OpenFOAM), to model small scale experiments with a moored buoy in linear waves. The experiments are well reproduced in the simulations, with the exception of second order effects when linear potential theory is used and of the small overestimation of the surge drift when computational fluid dynamics is used. The results suggest that MOODY can be used to successfully model moored floating wave energy converters.