Knowledge

In this article, the author describes how the creation of the Danish maritime museums in 1915 and 2013 – both generously funded by maritime foundations and actors – was perceived by the shipping industry as initiatives that would help market the industry in the eyes of the public. He argues more generally that national maritime museums constitute focal points for disseminating narratives that legitimate maritime activities and establish these activities as symbols of national identities. It is suggested that maritime historians, curators and scholars reflect on the relationship between maritime industry actors and museum exhibition narratives, and consider the interests and capital that potentially underpin museums’ and curators’ decisions.

This article examines the historical development of the Greenland shark (Somniosus microcephalus) fishery in North Greenland from 1774-1898. The purpose of the article is to present a starting point, a so-called baseline, for further studies of the extent of the historical fishery. With data from mainly two archival series, the historical catch figures are presented, which has led to the year 1862 as a realistic baseline for the historical fishery of the Greenland shark in North Greenland.

The agenda of objectual International Relations has shown why object matters, how they arise and with what effects. Far less attention has been paid to how objects are maintained and stabilized over time and how their coherence is achieved. To add this dimension to the debate, we suggest turning to the infrastructures of object maintenance. Infrastructures are social material arrangements that maintain objects and enable their use. We introduce a framework for the study of object infrastructures and illustrate it by drawing on the case of "maritime piracy". Providing a historical reconstruction of the infrastructures that produce piracy as an international object, we show that the growing proliferation of these infrastructures does not lead to an internal coherence of the object over time, but rather objectual fracturing and instability. We reveal how objects are often multiple rather than unitary. The article adds an important new dimension to the study of objects in International Relations.

In 2021 DS Norden celebrated its 150 years anniversary. In this book Martin Jes Iversen is analyzing the history of the shipping company which is one of the oldest in Denmark. In the first 50 years after being founded in 1871, Norden was a pioneer firm in Danish shipping. This period was followed by five decades of financial stability and gradual stagnation. But in the early 1990s the firm started its journey to become one of the leading firms in the global dry-bulk market. As the world experienced technological, economical and political changes, Norden would also change. Some of these changes were incremental. Others were more abrupt. But they were never predictable.

The aim of this article is to illustrate the most important changes in the regulatory framework of the shipping sector from the 1960s to 2010, and to analyse the basis for, and effects of, these changes. In order to explain how the transformation has occurred, we use two traditional maritime nations—Denmark and Norway—as case studies. First, we introduce the two regimes of Danish and Norwegian shipping: ‘the national regime’ from the early 1960s to the mid-1970s; and ‘the competitive regime’, which was fully established by the middle of the 1990s and still persists. Then, we briefly sketch the bargaining that accompanied the shift from the national regime to the competitive regime. Specifically, we show that the new regime primarily accommodated the interests of private actors such as shipping companies, rather than the interests of the authorities and the trade unions.

Across Europe, countries are joining forces in order to implement European Commission initiatives as the Blue Growth Strategy and the Directive on Maritime Spatial Planning. Collaboration on how to perform stakeholder involvement as well as create cross-border solutions has become a key issue around the European sea basins and holistic spatial planning approaches similar to terrestrial planning practices are now being implemented in the marine environment. Among the sectors in marine governance is the maritime cultural heritage under water as well as in the coastal zone, where the example of the Baltic Sea Region illustrates how this sector has become an inherent part of the new Blue Growth discourse and the MSP-policy development across the region. In order to utilise this potential, support for collaboration and shared understandings within the maritime cultural heritage community of practise is needed. This research has focused on how to develop a spatially enabled digital and collaborative working environment to support the co-creation of new shared spatial planning concepts for maritime cultural heritage. The development of the platform itself has been carried out in a close cooperation with the actual users including cultural heritage experts, public authorities and research institutes in the Baltic Sea Region.

The Danish shipping company Norden celebrated its 150th anniversary in February 2021. Norden is today the second largest Danish shipping company operating app. 375 vessels within the dry bulk and the product tanker segments.

How and why was Norden able to exploit the global growth opportunities, and which internal and external challenges did Norden face on this dramatic voyage?

In this video, Associate Professor Martin Jes Iversen (Copenhagen Business School) will present and analyze the recent development of Norden from around year 2000 to the present days. The video was developed in collaboration with MARLOG.

Containerfartens historiske udvikling bliver i litteraturen beskrevet som en revolution og en transformation af den internationale shippingbranche. De teknologiske og organisatoriske forandringer af livet til søs som fulgte med containerfarten har tilsvarende medført en forandring af maritime kulturer og en udfordring af de søfarendes identiteter.
Denne afhandling handler om danske containersøfolks erindringer, fortidsbrug og identitetskonstruktioner og undersøger, hvordan søfolkene fortæller sig selv i relation til deres levede erfaringer i containerfarten. Jeg analyserer i afhandlingen søfolkenes retrospektive fortidsfortolkninger som en måde at nærme mig en forståelse af de forandrede sømandsidentiteter.
Analytisk anlægger afhandlingen et subjektperspektiv, som anser fortiden for nærværende og åben i de mundtlige fortællingers fortolkninger og meningsforhandlinger af fortidens erfaringer. Jeg anskuer den narrative konstruktion af den personlige, autobiografiske, historie som identitetsdannende fortidsbrug, der udtrykker fortællerens subjektivitet. Med en erindringshistorisk tilgang til søfolkenes mundtlige fortællinger undersøger jeg, hvordan vi mennesker forstår os selv gennem de historier, vi fortæller om os selv.
Afhandlingen bygger empirisk på en række dybdegående oral history interviews med danske søfolk, der alle har erfaring inden for den internationale containerfart.
I afhandlingens analyser, viser jeg, hvordan søfolkene retfærdiggør og legitimerer deres valg om i første omgang at blive søfolk og senere at arbejde ombord på containerskibe. Jeg viser, hvordan søfolkene narrativt forhandler forskellige former for erfaret meningstab og aktivt tilskriver arbejdet og fællesskabet ombord på skibene en ny og brugbar mening. Jeg viser samtidig, hvordan den personlige historie konstrueres i dialog med kulturelt dominerende forestillinger og fortællinger. Sådanne forestillinger og fortællinger tilbyder den enkelte fortæller et tilgængeligt sprog at udtrykke sine personlige erfaringer i, men kan også virke begrænsende, hvis fortællerens erfaringer og forståelser ikke passer ind i de dominerende billeder. I sådanne tilfælde kan der opstå, hvad afhandlingen kalder en form for narrativt ubehag (discomposure), der kommer til udtryk som frustration og brud i fortællingens narrative sammenhæng.
Som en gennemgående metodisk pointe viser afhandlingen, hvordan interviewets intersubjektivitet er med til at forme den historie, som fortælles. Det personlige møde mellem fortæller og historiker og interviewets kulturelle kontekster indvirker på forskellig vis på den konstruerede historie. Fremfor at hævde en neutral og objektiv interviewsituation, tager afhandlingen i stedet konsekvensen af denne intersubjektivitet og skriver det konkrete møde mellem søfolkene som fortællere og mig som interviewer ind som en integreret del af den historiske fremstilling. Dette er både et narrativt greb og et metodisk valg, der skal sikre transparens ved at give læseren indblik i, hvordan historierne og mine tolkninger er blevet til.
Afhandlingen yder med sin tilgang og sine analyser flere bidrag til den eksisterende litteratur. Gennem de personlige fortællinger får vi større indsigt i søfolkenes levede liv og deres erfaringer med containerfartens historiske udvikling. Afhandlingen giver et menneskeligt perspektiv på historien om den internationale containerfart, der bidrager til vores viden om udviklingens identitetsmæssige betydning for de mænd og kvinder, som gennemlevede de historiske forandringer ude ombord på skibene.
Afhandlingen er en virksomhedshistorie, der tager oral history alvorligt både som forskningsfelt, metode og genre. Afhandlingen bidrager med sin erindringshistoriske tilgang til oral history til den fornyede samtale mellem forskningsfelterne oral history og virksomhedshistorie. Afhandlingen bringer metodiske og teoretiske indsigter fra den erindringshistoriske tradition ind i virksomhedshistorie og viser gennem sin egen narrative stil potentialet i en historieformidling, der sætter subjektivitet og erindring i centrum af sin analyse. Dermed bidrager afhandlingen også til den narrative vending inden for virksomhedshistorie ved ikke kun at anlægge et narrativt blik på de danske søfolks fortællinger men ved også at tage sig selv alvorligt som narrativ konstruktion.

Entrepreneurship is often understood as an individualistic endeavour. This article investigates how cultural communities shape entrepreneurial activity through the process of envisioning competing imagined futures. By deploying a microhistorical approach, it explores a public debate about the transition from sail to steam in a late nineteenth-century Danish maritime community. In the debate, local actors evaluated and negotiated future entrepreneurial actions as embedded in existing norms, interpretations of the past, and socio-technical systems rather than independent, non-conformist ventures. The article demonstrates the potential role of community when we attempt to understand better how entrepreneurs construct and dispute over imagined futures.

This book explores the transformation of Danish shipbuilding from 1975-2015. Specifically it expores the closure of B&W Shipyard in 1980, Nakskov Shipyard in 1986, Aalborg Shipyard in 1987-88, Burmeister and Wain Shipyard in 1996 and Danyard Frederikshavn in 1999. The author identifies 27 firms that were spun out during the closure of five Danish shipyards and finds that several of these firms were able to apply the inherent resources in new activities with more value added. The book also finds that the competencies of the redundant workers from the four shipyards were useful in other parts of the Danish labor market. The book sheds new light how internal and external factors influence the transformation of mature industries.