Several replacement fuel to today’s fossil based ship propulsion fuels have been addressed in MarEfuel. Key ones are; pyrolysis oil (blend in fuel), methanol and ammonia. These were singled out among many possible fuels from a preliminary analysis that indicated that they could play a key role in fulfilling the emission targets set politically and by the sector in the most cost effective manner. In the following they shall be treated in turn in some detail. Costs of several “blue” fuels have also been assessed. The projected costs are used in other parts of the MarEfuel project (e.g. for assessing the total cost of ownership).
The report focuses on analysing on-deck accidents in offshore environments using data from the Health and Safety Executive (HSE) which covers the period 1980-2005. It applies the Accident Anatomy (AA) method, which maps accident causes and consequences using fault trees and cause-consequence diagrams (CCDs). Unlike previous analyses, this report aims to extract deeper insights into accident patterns beyond general statistics.
For this report, on-deck operations involve material handling, tool use, and equipment operation in offshore environments.
The study analysed 10,846 records that cover accident events on both fixed and floating offshore units. The report focuses on cases where injuries or fatalities occurred. The analysis described in the report mapped 77 accident-prone operations and provides a detailed causal understanding of offshore accidents.
Despite the exhaustiveness of the analysis, there are limitations related to the used data. The HSE records primarily document physical and operational aspects of the accidents, leaving out design-related or organisational factors. Next, probabilities for the accident events considered in the analysis are not provided. This is due to the incomplete nature of the sources and the lack of information on the number of opportunities for accidents. The computation of probabilities will be feasible if data on the frequency of use of relevant components, machines, personnel, and workplaces has been also collected.
Subsea power cables are crucial for transmitting electrical power between offshore installations, islands, and onshore infrastructure. The demand for these cables has surged with the expansion of offshore wind farms. Despite mechanisation, divers are still needed for tasks such as installation, inspection, and remedial work, facing hazards like entanglement, equipment damage, and those to the environment. Therefore, analyzing accidents in diving operations during subsea cable installation is essential to develop safety measures that protect divers and ensure successful installations. This document reports an analysis of the hazards and accident events linked to diving operations during subsea cable installation. Few risk assessments of these operations have been made publicly available.
Various methods can be used to analyze diving accidents, but this document reports on the use of the Accident Anatomy (AA) method. The AA method combines fault trees and cause-consequence diagrams to map accident causes and consequences. In the AA method, evidence-based (post-accident) analysis is used jointly with predictive analysis to identify deviations from normal conditions that could lead to accidents.
To exhaust the identification of hazards, the AA method is additionally powered by an error mode classification checklist, which classifies errors that produce similar effects on a system. Analysts used this checklist to identify hazards for each basic diving operation task identified.
As a data source, 163 documents were analyzed, including accident records, regulations, manuals, and scientific papers. Basic tasks associated with diving operations are identified, along with hazards for each task. Predictive analysis identifies potential events and unwanted consequences when normal conditions (specified in safety procedures and specifications) deviate. The unwanted consequences that were found include delays, technical problems, injuries, and fatalities. Ultimately, safety measures are identified for each basic task to reduce the effects of hazards.
This is an informational document that communicates the account of SDU participants of the MISSION project on how to prove whether the system being developed by the consortium improves the safety of ships in the port areas.
The methods suggested in this document are based on an overview of the state-of-practice guidelines and state-of-the-art methods in safety risk analysis. They are compliant with the Guidelines for Formal Safety Assessment (FSA) and The Ship Inspection Report Programme (SIRE).
Other accounts on the same issues may exist that are either complementary or preferred over the methods described in this paper. This document is intended to make discussions constructive by possibly benchmarking other views with those described here and by working out a clear methodology and guidelines for conducting a safety risk analysis of the system being developed; and for informing decisions on the system’s acceptability or improvements needed to achieve the acceptability.
Aarhus University, DCE - Danish Centre for Environment and Energy, has prepared an overall assessment of the potential environmental impacts from a major release or spill of ammonia in relation to production and transportation of ammonia in a PtX plant or by shipping in Greenland. Three sites were included in the assessment: Kangerlussuaq (Sdr. Strømfjord), Kangerlussuatsiaq (Evighedsfjorden) and Nuup Kangerlua (Godthåbsfjorden). The overall findings shows that a large, worst-case ammonia spill could cause severe toxic damage to organisms during the passage of the ammonia cloud from within a few km to possibly more than 10 km from the source. This could lead to local loss of animal and plant abundance for some years. However, the ammonia will be quickly diluted and degraded and will not be transferred in the food web, and the mortality will not seriously impact plant and animal populations at a regional scale. There could be a fertilising effect of ammonia on the nutrient-poor terrestrial environment lasting for some years.
Rapporter fra flere globale miljøinstitutioner, her
-
under den internationale science-policy platform
om biodiversitet og økosystemtjenester (herefter
IPBES), understreger behovet for genopretning af
økosystemer (1,2). Den seneste globale IPBES-rap
-
port fra maj 2019 peger således på, at forringelser
af økosystemer på land og i havet underminerer
livsgrundlaget for 3,2 milliarder mennesker. Gen
-
opretning bliver fremhævet som en af de vigtig
-
ste handlemuligheder for effektivt at begrænse
tabet af biodiversitet og forbedre livsgrundlaget
for os mennesker ved at imødegå forringelser for
en række økosystemtjenester. Det nuværende årti
2021-2030 er af UNEP udpeget til årtiet for genop
-
retning med det formål at genetablere ødelagte
eller forarmede økosystemer verden over.
IPBES rapporterne dokumenterer, at biodiversi
-
tetskrisen er en altomfattende og global udfor
-
dring, og at krisen er på linje med klimakrisen. De
tiltagende klimaændringer er ligeledes en af ho
-
vedårsagerne til tab af biodiversitet (2). Der er af
hensyn til begge kriser behov for, at der beskyttes
og genetableres velfungerende og uforstyrrede
økosystemer. Der bør derfor ske en national ud
-
møntning af resultaterne fra de internationale aftaler baseret på den bedst tilgængelige viden.