Wind Propulsion Systems (WPS) have gained significant attention as a means of decarbonizing shipping. Limitations in available deck space, emissions reduction targets, and regulatory compliance have led to a wide array of potential WPS configurations, each exhibiting distinct aerodynamic performance and requiring unique optimum sail trims for each unit due to complex interactions. This variability challenges existing aerodynamic models and optimization efforts for maximizing fuel savings. To address this, we present a novel methodology that, for the first time in WPS aerodynamic performance prediction, combines Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD), independent sail trim optimization, and Machine Learning (ML) to develop surrogate models — Gaussian Process Regression and Feedforward Neural Networks — that rapidly predict aerodynamic performance with CFD-equivalent accuracy. These surrogates capture aerodynamic interactions across various WPS configurations, including unit number, deck arrangement, independent sail trim, hull characteristics, and wind conditions. While employing established ML techniques, our approach is novel in its resource-efficient generation of a comprehensive aerodynamic database, derived from the first in-depth independent trim optimization of a DynaRig case study. Our approach enables the modeling of complex, non-linear interactions that traditional interpolation methods fail to capture. Results show that the developed surrogate models achieve CFD-level accuracy, with an average error below 1 while significantly reducing computational time. This ML-enhanced framework facilitates extensive, rapid WPS design optimizations, supporting efficient integration into performance prediction programs (PPPs) and maximizing fuel savings and emissions reductions tailored to specific routes and wind conditions.Machine Learning; CFD-Simulations; Aerodynamic Performance; Wind Propulsion Systems; Green Shipping; Independent Sail Trim Optimization.
This study introduces WindWise, a cost–benefit analysis and design optimization tool for Wind Propulsion Systems (WPS) in sustainable shipping. By integrating route simulations, ship constraints, and fuel pricing scenarios, WindWise determines the optimal WPS configuration to maximize fuel savings and minimize payback periods. A retrofit case study of an oil tanker evaluates two WPS classes—DynaRigs and Rotor Sails—across multiple operational and economic conditions. Results reveal that optimal configurations vary based on constraints: in an unconstrained scenario, larger, well-spaced installations minimize aerodynamic losses, whereas realistic constraints shift the preference towards smaller, distributed setups to mitigate cargo loss and air draft penalties. Rotor Sails offer lower upfront costs and shorter payback periods for modest savings targets and for side-wind routes, while DynaRigs emerge as the more viable solution for higher emissions reductions and long-term profitability. Optimization of WPS configurations proves crucial, with non-optimized configurations exhibiting payback periods over 150% higher than optimized ones. Although payback period remains an important metric, considering both payback and net present value provides a more comprehensive assessment of WPS financial viability, with Rotor Sails generally offering faster payback but DynaRigs delivering higher long-term profitability across most scenarios.
This study introduces WindWise, a cost–benefit analysis and design optimization tool for Wind Propulsion Systems (WPS) in sustainable shipping. By integrating route simulations, ship constraints, and fuel pricing scenarios, WindWise determines the optimal WPS configuration to maximize fuel savings and minimize payback periods. A retrofit case study of an oil tanker evaluates two WPS classes—DynaRigs and Rotor Sails—across multiple operational and economic conditions. Results reveal that optimal configurations vary based on constraints: in an unconstrained scenario, larger, well-spaced installations minimize aerodynamic losses, whereas realistic constraints shift the preference towards smaller, distributed setups to mitigate cargo loss and air draft penalties. Rotor Sails offer lower upfront costs and shorter payback periods for modest savings targets and for side-wind routes, while DynaRigs emerge as the more viable solution for higher emissions reductions and long-term profitability. Optimization of WPS configurations proves crucial, with non-optimized configurations exhibiting payback periods over 150% higher than optimized ones. Although payback period remains an important metric, considering both payback and net present value provides a more comprehensive assessment of WPS financial viability, with Rotor Sails generally offering faster payback but DynaRigs delivering higher long-term profitability across most scenarios.