Design
Our data set, collected via surveys from top managers and project managers involved in 86 NPD projects in 85 firms, is analyzed using PLS structural equation modeling.
Purpose
This study examines how technical drivers as well as social drivers influence organic communication and top management involvement (TMI) in new product development (NPD) projects. Technical drivers are strategic importance and product innovativeness and social drivers are intrinsic and extrinsic relevance. Organic communication is defined as continuous, bi-directional, and informal communication between top management and the NPD teams. Further, arguing that TMI must be studied as multi-faceted construct, TMI is conceptualized to occur as guidance, active motivation, providing resources, and creating a tolerant climate. Subsequently, the effect of TMI and organic communication on NPD performance is investigated.
Findings
We show that the strategic importance of the project has a positive influence on TMI through active motivation, providing resources, and creating a tolerant climate for innovation, but does not have an effect on guidance. Results also show that active motivation and organic communication improve budget and schedule adherence, whereas providing guidance and stimulating a tolerant climate have detrimental effects. In summary, our results show that only active motivation enhances all types of performance while stimulating a tolerant climate appears to have the opposite effect. The results revealed that organic communication between top management and the NPD team has a strong positive effect on all elements of TMI (providing guidance, actively motivating the NPD team, providing resources, and creating a tolerant climate). In other words, when top management communicates with the NPD team throughout the project in an informal way and listens to the team in addition to engaging in a one-way communication, they are more likely to be seen by the team as being deeply involved in the project.
Accurate prediction of wave transformation is key in the design of coastal and nearshore structures which typically depends on numerical models. Turbulent and rotational effects call for the use of Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) solvers of which a large range of formulations including free surface treatments exists. Physical wave flume tests of wave propagation over a submerged bar with various levels of nonlinearity, regularity, and wave-breaking, dedicated to numerical model benchmarking or validation, were carried out in the Ocean and Coastal Engineering Laboratory of Aalborg University. Three fundamentally different CFD models each widespread within their category are benchmarked against the experimental data. The CFD models are based on (i) the Volume of Fluid (VoF) based interFoam solver of OpenFOAM, (ii) the sigma-transformation solver of MIKE 3 Waves Model FM, and (iii) the weakly compressible delta-SPH solver of DualSPHysics. Accuracy of the numerical models is assessed from surface elevation time series, evaluation metrics (averaged errors on surface elevations, amplitudes, phases, and wave set-up), and spectral analyses to calculate the amplitude and phase contents of primary and higher-order components along the wave flume. Applicability is assessed from computational costs and ease-of-use factors such as the effort to configure the numerical models and achieve convergence. In general, the numerical models have high correlation to the physical tests and are as such suitable to model complex wave transformation with an accuracy sufficient for most coastal engineering applications. The VoF model performs more accurately under the turbulent conditions of breaking waves, increasing its relative accuracy in the prediction of downwave surface elevation. The sigma transformation model has simulation times one to two orders of magnitude lower than those of the VoF and SPH models.