Knowledge

Keyword: Mooring system

paper

Numerical Modelling of Mooring Systems for Floating Wave Energy Converters

Guilherme Moura Paredes, Johannes Palm, Claes Eskilsson, Lars Bergdahl & Francisco Taveira-Pinto

A numerical model (MOODY) for the study of the dynamics of cables is presented in Palm et al. (2013), which was developed for the design of mooring systems for floating wave energy converters. But how does it behave when it is employed together with the tools used to model floating bodies? To answer this question, MOODY was coupled to a linear potential theory code and to a computational fluid dynamics code (OpenFOAM), to model small scale experiments with a moored buoy in linear waves. The experiments are well reproduced in the simulations, with the exception of second order effects when linear potential theory is used and of the small overestimation of the surge drift when computational fluid dynamics is used. The results suggest that MOODY can be used to successfully model moored floating wave energy converters.

Faculdade de Engenharia da Universidade do Porto / 2014
Go to paper
paper

Experimental Investigation of Mooring Configurations for Wave Energy Converters

Guilherme Moura Paredes, Johannes Palm, Claes Eskilsson, Lars Bergdahl & Francisco Taveira-Pinto

Mooring systems are required to keep floating wave energy converters (WECs) on station. The mooring concept might impact the performance of the WEC, its cost and its integrity. With the aim of clarifying the pros and cons of different mooring designs, we present the results from physical model experiments of three different mooring concepts in regular and irregular waves, including operational and survival conditions. The parameters investigated are the tension in the cables, the motions of the device in the different degrees of freedom and the seabed footprint in each case. We can see that the mooring system affects the performance of the wave energy converter, but the magnitude of the impact depends on the parameter analysed, on the mode of motion studied and on the conditions of the sea. Moreover, different configurations have similar performances in some situations and the choice of one over another might come down to factors such as the type of soil of the seabed, the spacing desired between devices, or environmental impacts. The results of our experiments provide information for a better selection of the mooring system for a wave energy converter when several constraints are taken into account (power production, maximum displacements, extreme tensions, etc).

International Journal of Marine Energy / 2016
Go to paper
paper

Influence of floater geometry on snap loads in mooring systems for wave energy converters

Johannes Palm & Claes Eskilsson

Mooring systems for floating wave energy converters often rely on floaters to allow for minimum restraints of the body motion in heavy. However, the inclusion of floaters also introduce possible slack-taut scenarios induced by the dynamic response of the floater in relation to the fair-lead point of the mooring. This can increase the occurrence of snap loads. The present study outlines the work to include floaters and sinks into a high-order discontinuous Galerkin model for mooring cable dynamics. Numerical simulations of a mooring leg adapted from the Waves4Power full-scale device are performed, and the results from varying the floater geometry are analyzed.

For this case the floater influence on the occurrence of snap loads was clearly evident. There is a strong correlation between floater pitch response and cable slack in the upper mooring cable. For a floater with constant buoyancy, increasing the floater height and thereby increasing the pitch inertia of the floater is shown to decrease the range of frequencies where cable slack occurs. It is illustrated that for some cases, changing floater geometry can avoid slack altogether. A careful design of the floater geometry can thus make a large difference for the dynamic load factor of the mooring system.

European Tidal and Wave Energy Conference / 2019
Go to paper