Accurate prediction of wave transformation is key in the design of coastal and nearshore structures which typically depends on numerical models. Turbulent and rotational effects call for the use of Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) solvers of which a large range of formulations including free surface treatments exists. Physical wave flume tests of wave propagation over a submerged bar with various levels of nonlinearity, regularity, and wave-breaking, dedicated to numerical model benchmarking or validation, were carried out in the Ocean and Coastal Engineering Laboratory of Aalborg University. Three fundamentally different CFD models each widespread within their category are benchmarked against the experimental data. The CFD models are based on (i) the Volume of Fluid (VoF) based interFoam solver of OpenFOAM, (ii) the sigma-transformation solver of MIKE 3 Waves Model FM, and (iii) the weakly compressible delta-SPH solver of DualSPHysics. Accuracy of the numerical models is assessed from surface elevation time series, evaluation metrics (averaged errors on surface elevations, amplitudes, phases, and wave set-up), and spectral analyzes to calculate the amplitude and phase contents of primary and higher-order components along the wave flume. Applicability is assessed from computational costs and ease-of-use factors such as the effort to configure the numerical models and achieve convergence. In general, the numerical models have high correlation to the physical tests and are as such suitable to model complex wave transformation with an accuracy sufficient for most coastal engineering applications. The VoF model performs more accurately under the turbulent conditions of breaking waves, increasing its relative accuracy in the prediction of downwave surface elevation. The sigma transformation model has simulation times one to two orders of magnitude lower than those of the VoF and SPH models.
High-fidelity viscous computational fluid dynamics (CFD) models coupled to dynamic mooring models is becoming an established tool for marine wave-body-mooring (WBM) interaction problems. The CFD and the mooring solvers most often communicate by exchanging positions and mooring forces at the mooring fairleads. Mooring components such as submerged buoys and clump weights are usually not resolved in the CFD model, but are treated as Morison-type bodies. This paper presents two recent developments in high-fidelity WBM modelling: (i) a one-way fluid-mooring coupling that samples the CFD fluid kinematics to approximate drag and inertia forces in the mooring model; and (ii) support for inter-moored multibody simulations that can resolve fluid dynamics on a mooring component level. The developments are made in the high-order discontinuous Galerkin mooring solver MoodyCore, and in the two-phase incompressible Navier–Stokes finite volume solver OpenFOAM. The fluid-mooring coupling is verified with experimental tests of a mooring cable in steady current. It is also used to model the response of the slack-moored DeepCwind FOWT exposed to regular waves. Minor effects of fluid-mooring coupling were noted, as expected since this a mild wave case. The inter-mooring development is demonstrated on a point-absorbing WEC moored with a hybrid mooring system, fully resolved in CFD-MoodyCore. The WEC (including a quasi-linear PTO) and the submerged buoys are resolved in CFD, while the mooring dynamics include inter-mooring effects and the one-way sampling of the flow. The combined wave-body-mooring model is judged to be very complete and to cover most of the relevant effects for marine WBM problems.