This paper presents the methods developed and key findings of the IWEC project performed by Ocean Harvesting Technologies AB (OHT). It aimed to reduce the levelized cost of energy (LCoE) of OHT’s wave energy converter InfinityWEC, by analysing how different key parameters impact cost and annual output using a model of a 100-MW array installation. Component-level cost functions were developed and mapped to key parameters and constraints of the system. A large number of system configurations were then evaluated with a numerically efficient 3 degree-of-freedom (DoF) nonlinear radiationdiffraction model in WEC-Sim along with OHT’s sea statetuned polynomial reactive control (PRC). The most promising configurations were identified and investigated in more detail. The configuration with the best LCoE were finally identified and analysed further, including estimation of the effect of changing the PRC to model predictive control, which resulted in 17-34% higher annual output and 12-23% lower LCoE. The final LCoE was found to be 93-162 EUR MWh at 100 MW installed capacity. An important finding from the study is that using simplified metrics such as CAPEX/ton was found to be irrelevant. Numerical wave tank testing, high-fidelity computational fluid dynamics (CFD), were used to tune the viscous drag of the 3 DoF WEC-Sim model. Applying verification and validation (V&V) techniques the CFD simulations showed a relatively large numerical uncertainty, but the average power and the motion responses were found to be sufficiently accurate.
Coupled mooring analysis using CFD with dynamic mooring models is becoming an established field. This is an important step for better predictions of responses of moored marine structures in extreme sea states and also for capturing the low-frequency response correctly. The coupling between the CFD and mooring solvers are most often carried out by exchanging the fairlead/anchor points and fairlead forces. In this paper we will discuss the effects of using (i) viscous fluid flow on a mooring component level (submerged buoys and clump weights) and (ii) the fluid-structure coupling between the viscous fluid solver and the mooring system.