This paper investigates the influence of a crown wall on wave overtopping on rubble mound breakwaters. Existing data is used to modify the EurOtop overtopping formula updated by Eldrup et al. (2022) to cover the influence of the crown wall. The effect of raising the wall above the armor crest (elevated wall) or lowering the wall below the armor crest (lowered wall) is investigated. A crown wall at the armor crest level is considered as the reference case. By increasing the elevation of either the armor crest or the crown wall, overtopping is reduced and by lowering either of them, overtopping increases. The influence of the crown wall height, elevated or lowered compared to the armor crest, is not considered accurately in the present design guidelines and thus corrections are suggested. For an elevated wall, a modified crest width has been defined, to better describe the presence of the armor crest in front of the wall. For the lowered wall the effective freeboard might be taken as the average of the wall and armor freeboards. The improvement compared to existing methods is significant, especially for breakwaters with a large elevated wall. The proposed modifications to the EurOtop Manual increase the range of applicability with respect to the wall configuration.
In this paper existing guidelines to predict wave overtopping on rubble mound breakwaters and coastal structures are modified and improved with respect to the influence of the roughness and crest width. Data from recently made model tests and existing data are combined to demonstrate the need for modifying these formulations in EurOtop. A new reduction factor γcw for the crest width is established and is an improvement of the method by Besley. The influence of the roughness of the slope normally also includes an influence of the breaker parameter when it is larger than a certain limit (EurOtop suggest ξm-1.0 > 5). The present study shows that the breaker parameter is not the ideal dimensionless parameter describing the influence of the wave period for breakwaters with steep slopes, as for such structures the front slope has much less influence on the overtopping than the wave steepness. Thus slope angle and wave steepness have been uncoupled to describe the influence of the armor roughness on wave overtopping. The improvement in the overtopping prediction compared to EurOtop is significant, specifically for the new data sets that have data outside the range of the calibration data used for influence of roughness in EurOtop. The proposed improved methods enlarge the range of applicability with respect to crest width and wave steepness.